球球大作战好号和密码共享工具 最新免费版
 | Na tej stronie znajduj? si? najcz??ciej zadawane pytania dotycz?ce Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use. To FAQ nie jest cz??ci? Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use. Nie jest te? dokumentem prawnym ani porada prawn?. Mamy jednak nadziej?, ?e mo?e by? ona pomocna. Zastrzega si?, ?e w razie wyst?pienia jakichkolwiek rozbie?no?ci w znaczeniu lub interpretacji pomi?dzy oryginaln? wersj? niniejszego dokumentu w j?zyku angielskim a jego t?umaczeniem, wi???ca pozostanie tre?? w j?zyku angielskim. |
Warunki u?ytkowania Wikimedia Foundation: Najcz??ciej zadawanie pytania dotycz?ce ujawniania p?atnego edytowania
Czy ten przepis mnie dotyczy, je?li po prostu edytuj? lub przesy?am multimedia jako nieop?acany wolontariusz?
Absolutnie nie! Projekty Wikimedia s? redagowane i wspierane przez dziesi?tki tysi?cy nieop?acanych wolontariuszy. Wikipedia i inne projekty Wikimedia s? prowadzone przez organizacj? non-profit - jedyn? witryn? non-profit znajduj?c? si? w czo?ówce witryn internetowych na ?wiecie. To w?a?nie ten wolontariat sprawia, ?e ??nasze projekty s? tak wyj?tkowe i szeroko stosowane. Jako nieop?acany wolontariusz jeste? zach?cany do edytowania i przesy?ania tre?ci bez konieczno?ci ujawniania ich zgodnie z postanowieniami warunków u?ytkowania.
Jednak niektórzy wspó?twórcy otrzymuj? zap?at? za swoje edycje. Ci wspó?autorzy poprawiaj? ogóln? jako?? projektów, gdy edytuj? z neutralnego punktu widzenia. Obejmuje to wielu wspó?pracowników zwi?zanych z instytucjami, takimi jak uniwersytety, galerie, biblioteki, archiwa i muzea. Z drugiej strony p?atne redagowanie poprzez wspieranie pewnych tre?ci - tj. p?atne edytowanie artyku?ów promuj?cych firmy, produkty i us?ugi - jest zdecydowanie odradzane lub zakazane w wi?kszo?ci projektów, je?li nie we wszystkich.
Je?li nie otrzymujesz zap?aty za edycj?, nie musisz si? martwi? o ujawnienie zgodnie z tym przepisem: wszystko jest w porz?dku. Nale?ysz do niesamowitej spo?eczno?ci wolontariuszy, którzy wspó?tworz? bezprecedensowy zasób bezp?atnych informacji dost?pnych dla ca?ego ?wiata.
Je?li otrzymujesz wynagrodzenie, musisz to ujawni?. Poinformuj spo?eczno??, dodaj?c ten tekst do podsumowania edycji, strony u?ytkownika lub strony dyskusji, aby uczciwie ujawni? swoje zamiary. Ale upewnij si?, ?e znasz zasady: jak wyja?nimy bardziej szczegó?owo poni?ej, wk?ad w projekty Wikimedia s?u??cy interesom p?ac?cego klienta i ukrywanie p?atnej przynale?no?ci mo?e by? problematyczne.
Jedna ma?a uwaga: niektóre projekty maj? zasady dotycz?ce konfliktu interesów, które ró?ni? si? (i s? silniejsze) od tego przepisu w warunkach u?ytkowania. Te zasady mog? uniemo?liwi? Ci niektóre formy redagowania przez wolontariuszy, na przyk?ad wspó?tworzenie artyku?ów o sobie. Zanim zaczniesz, zapoznaj si? z tymi zasadami dotycz?cymi spo?eczno?ci! Je?li masz jakie? pytania, nie kr?puj si? skontaktowa? ze spo?eczno?ci? twojego lokalnego projektu. Ka?dy projekt b?dzie zawiera? informacje kontaktowe (zwykle na dole strony) i generalnie ma ró?ne miejsca na pytania i og?oszenia.
Jak to postanowienie wp?ywa na nauczycieli, profesorów i pracowników galerii, bibliotek, archiwów i muzeów (?GLAM”)?
Wymagania te nie powinny powstrzymywa? nauczycieli, profesorów ani osób pracuj?cych w galeriach, bibliotekach, archiwach i instytucjach muzealnych (? GLAM ”) przed dokonywaniem edycji w dobrej wierze! Je?li nale?ysz do jednej z tych kategorii, jeste? zobowi?zany do przestrzegania przepisu dotycz?cego ujawniania informacji tylko wtedy, gdy otrzymujesz wynagrodzenie od swojego pracodawcy lub klienta specjalnie za t? konkretn? edycj? oraz przes?anie multmediów do projektu Wikimedia.
Na przyk?ad, je?li profesor Uniwersytetu X otrzymuje wynagrodzenie bezpo?rednio od Uniwersytetu X za napisanie o tym uniwersytecie w Wikipedii, profesor musi ujawni?, ?e edycja jest op??cona. Istnieje bezpo?rednia wymiana quid pro quo: pieni?dze na edycje. Je?li jednak profesorowi po prostu p?aci si? wynagrodzenie za nauczanie i prowadzenie badań, a jego uniwersytet zach?ca go jedynie do generalnego wk?adu bez bardziej szczegó?owych instrukcji, profesor ten nie musi ujawnia? swojego powi?zania z uniwersytetem.
To samo dotyczy pracowników GLAM. Ujawnienie jest konieczne tylko wtedy, gdy obiecano lub otrzymano wynagrodzenie w zamian za okre?lony wk?ad. Pracownik muzeum, który generalnie uczestniczy w projektach bez bardziej szczegó?owych instrukcji ze strony muzeum, nie musi ujawnia? swojego powi?zania z muzeum. Z drugiej strony wikipedysta Rezydent, który otrzymuje specjalne wynagrodzenie za edycj? artyku?u o archiwum, w którym jest zatrudniony, powinien po prostu ujawni?, ?e jest p?atnym wikipedyst? Rezydentem zwi?zanym z tym archiwum. Jest to wystarczaj?ce ujawnienie dla wymogów celów projektu.
Jak egzekwowanie tego przepisu przez spo?eczno?? dzia?a z istniej?cymi zasadami dotycz?cymi prywatno?ci i post?powania?
Wa?ne jest, aby chroni? redaktorów dzia?aj?cych w dobrej wierze. Podobnie jak w przypadku zasad dotycz?cych pacynek, postanowienie dotycz?ce zasady ujawniania p?atnych edycji w Warunkach u?ycia powinno równowa?y? si? z istniej?c? polityk? i praktyk? dzia?ania, tak aby istnia?a sprawiedliwa równowaga mi?dzy identyfikowaniem op?aconych edycji a ochron? tych, którzy pomagaj? rozwija? Wikipedi? i inne projekty Wikimedia.
These policies include the cross-project value of civility, which is a pillar of Wikipedia; relevant project policies, like ENWP:OUTING; and the Terms of Use, which prohibit stalking and abuse. (In cases of more extreme behaviors, local law may also apply.)
This requirement, like others, should be applied constructively to enable collaboration and improve our projects. Users who violate them should first be warned and informed about these rules, and then only blocked if necessary. In other words: assume good faith and do not bite the newcomers. Harassment should also be avoided. For example, under the English Wikipedia policy on harassment, users must not publicly share personal information about other users.
How can I avoid disclosure under this provision of the Terms of Use?
If you wish to avoid the disclosure requirement of this provision, you should abstain from receiving compensation for your edits.
What is the "applicable law" for paid contributions on Wikipedia and its sister sites? Are undisclosed paid contributions potentially illegal?
Depending on where you operate, a variety of laws could apply to you, your business, or your clients, such as unfair competition and simple fraud statutes. In addition to the requirements of the Terms of Use, you must comply with those laws in your disclosure and execution of paid contributions.
We cannot advise you about specific legal requirements, and you should employ your own lawyer if you have questions. That said, as general background, deceptive business practices, such as concealing a professional affiliation, are prohibited in many jurisdictions.
In the United States, for example, "Unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce are unlawful."[1] The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has the nationwide authority to regulate this.[2] For instance, if you failed to disclose in a relevant online forum that you are affiliated with a company under the FTC's regulation, FTC regulations warn of liability:
The FTC's guide Dot Com Disclosures specifies that disclosures like this one "must be communicated effectively so that consumers are likely to notice and understand them". State law may also apply, as in the N.Y. Attorney General's 2013 investigation regarding companies engaging in astroturfing.[3]
Outside the US, other laws may also require disclosure of paid contributions. The EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (and corresponding national versions) ban use of "editorial content ... to promote a product where a trader has paid for the promotion without making that clear".[4] National legislation of EU member states may further restrict undisclosed paid contributions. For example, competition laws have been used by national courts in Germany to find violations when a contributor failed to properly disclose their affiliation.
Where legally-required disclosures cannot be made in a way that complies with community rules, the community rules take precedence. For example, if local laws require disclosure of sponsorship of an edit in the article text itself, and putting such a message in the article text violated community rules (as it likely does in most projects), then such edits would be prohibited.
Jakie s? pozaprawne mo?liwe negatywne skutki p?atnych edycji?
Jak pokazuj? przyk?ady z ?ycia, p?atna edycja bez odpowiedniego ujawnienia mo?e skutkowa? negatywnym rozg?osem dla firm, klientów i osób fizycznych. Okaza?o si?, ?e prasa uwa?nie ?ledzi takie historie. Brak ujawnienia informacji o p?atnym wk?adzie mo?e prowadzi? do utraty zaufania szerszej publiczno?ci, ni? tylko spo?eczno?? Wikimedia.
Aby zachowa? dobr? wol? i unikn?? nieporozumień najlepsz? polityk? jest przejrzysto?? i przyjazna wspó?praca z edytorami, którzy otrzymuj? wynagrodzenie za edycje. Aby unikn?? k?opotliwej sytuacji, nale?y te edycje ujawni? zgodnie z wymogami Warunków korzystania, a tak?e lokalnymi zasadami dotycz?cymi op?aconych sk?adek, takich jak Wikipedia:Konflikt interesów.
What does "compensation" mean?
As used in this provision, "compensation" means an exchange of money, goods, or services.
What does the phrase "employer, client, and affiliation" mean?
This means the person or organization that is paying you compensation – money, goods, or services – with respect to any contribution to a Wikimedia project. This could be a business, a charity, an educational institution, a government department or another individual, for example. The disclosure requirement is simple, and requires you to provide this information in one of the three ways described above. If you are editing an article on Wikipedia on behalf of your employer, for example, you must disclose your employer's details. If you have been hired by a public relations firm to edit Wikipedia, you must disclose both the firm and the firm's client. If you are a compensated Wikimedian in residence, for example, you must note what GLAM organisation is paying you.
Are paid editing disclosures required only when editing Wikipedia articles?
No, you must disclose your employment, client, and affiliation when making any type of paid contribution to any Wikimedia project. This includes edits on talk pages and edits on projects other than Wikipedia.
Note that some projects have adopted an alternative disclosure policy that may change the level of disclosure required.
Does this provision mean that paid contributions are always allowed as long as they are disclosed?
No. Users must also comply with each Wikimedia project's additional policies and guidelines, as well as any applicable laws. For example, English Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view requires that editing be done fairly, proportionally and (as far as possible) without bias; these requirements must be followed even if the contributor discloses making paid edits.
How should I disclose paid contributions in my user page?
You may explain that you work for a particular client or employer on your user page. If you work for company Acme, and, as part of your job responsibilities, you edit Wikipedia articles about company Acme, you satisfy the minimum requirement of the Terms of Use if you simply say that you edit on behalf of company Acme on your user page. You however need to follow community or Foundation policies, in addition to applicable law.
How should I disclose paid contributions in my edit summary?
You may represent your employer, affiliation, and client in the edit summary box before you "save" your edit or contribution. For example, before saving your edits to a Wikipedia article about your client, X, you may write this note in the edit summary box: "X has hired me to update their Wikipedia article" or "I work for X."
How should I disclose paid contributions on a talk page?
You may represent your employer, affiliation, and client in the relevant talk page either before, or immediately after, you "save" your edit or contribution.
Do I have to disclose the details of the compensation I am receiving?
You do not have to disclose the amount or type of compensation you are receiving for editing; the minimum required is that you disclose your employer, client, and affiliation.
Can a local project adopt an alternative disclosure policy for paid editing?
Disclosure of paid contributions to any of the Wikimedia projects is a requirement under the disclosure provision of the Terms of Use. Nonetheless, individual projects may create an alternative disclosure policy when their projects or communities have particular needs to either strengthen or reduce the requirements. The provision gives communities discretion to adjust the rules set out in the Terms of Use to their specific project after following the project's standard consensus-based process for establishing core policies. Adopting an alternative disclosure policy requires consensus, consistent with the project's past practice and local understanding of what consensus is.
To adopt a pre-existing policy as an alternative disclosure policy, a project community must gain consensus specifically to replace the paid editing disclosure requirements in the Terms of Use with the policy of the project. For an example of an alternative disclosure policy, see this proposal on MediaWiki.
After creating such a policy, projects must include their policy on the list of alternative disclosure policies. This list will help editors and sister projects to quickly discover what the local project policy for paid editing is, or if the default applies.
Does this provision mean that Wikimedia projects must change their policies?
Wikimedia projects may change their policies to reference this requirement, to require stricter requirements for paid contributions, or to provide alternative rules.
What projects have established alternative disclosure policies?
Projects that have alternative policies are listed here: list of alternative disclosure policies.
When did this clause go into effect?
The disclosure provision of the Terms of Use went into effect on June 16, 2014. The provision was the result of a discussion with the community, after an initial proposal to amend the Terms was made by the Wikimedia Foundation's Legal and Community Advocacy Team. The discussion was closed on March 25, 2014, and the amendment was approved by the Board of Trustees on April 25, 2014.
Odwo?ania
- ↑ Federal Trade Commission Act 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1)
- ↑ Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(2)
- ↑ Parino v. Bidrack, Inc., 838 F. Supp. 2d 900, 905 (N.D. Cal. 2011) (plaintiff's allegations, including defendant's creation and use of fake reviews on website, were sufficient to bring a claim under California's Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law)